Home › PPLI for Singapore Residents
PPLI · The Singapore position
Private placement life insurance in Singapore: what the policy does for a Singapore resident
Elsewhere, PPLI is sold on tax. In Singapore that argument mostly falls away, because a resident individual already pays little or no tax on a private portfolio. What remains is real but narrower: the tax another country still charges you, how the money passes across borders, and which Singapore protections apply to which policies. This page takes them in that order and puts the cost beside them.
Hypothetical S$5,000,000 portfolio, one year
S$0
Singapore tax on S$200,000 of foreign dividends and interest received by a resident individual who holds the portfolio directly
S$30,000 to S$60,000
A year of policy charges at 0.6% to 1.2% on the same portfolio held in a policy, with no Singapore tax saved in return
Assumes the income arises outside Singapore, is not received through a Singapore partnership (Income Tax Act 1947 s 13(7A)) and that no other country taxes the holder. The charge range is a working assumption, not a quote.
Singapore law as at 27 September 2026, Year of Assessment 2026, for an individual resident in Singapore who owns the policy personally. Where a rule belongs to another country, that country is named.
PPLI.com is a research publisher, not an insurer, broker or financial adviser, and is not licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Nothing here is an offer of insurance. To buy a policy, deal with an insurer or adviser licensed or exempted by MAS and check it on the MAS Financial Institutions Directory.
The position in brief
Three things to know before anything else
01
Where the policy can earn its cost
When another country still taxes you: US citizenship, the UK inheritance tax tail, an Indian or Australian return, PRC domicile, French or German rules on death benefits. A policy that complies with that country’s rules changes how that country taxes the money. Also when assets sit in several countries and one contract with named beneficiaries is simpler than several grants of probate.
02
In Singapore alone
Foreign income received by a resident individual, one-tier dividends and approved-bank interest are exempt, gains on investments are generally not taxable, and there is no estate duty. A policy saves a Singapore-only family no Singapore tax, and its charges are a cost.
03
Which Singapore rules apply
Statutory nominations and their creditor protection apply only to policies from licensed insurers governed by Singapore law. The Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme covers only MAS-licensed insurers, within caps, and not investment-linked values. Nobody may solicit in Singapore for an insurer MAS has not licensed.
What private placement life insurance is
Private placement life insurance is a life policy written for one policyholder or one family, usually for a single large premium, whose value follows a pool of investments the insurer holds against it. The insurer owns the investments; the policyholder owns the policy. When the policy is surrendered or the life insured dies, the insurer pays the value of that pool plus whatever life cover the contract adds. The general mechanics, and the American rules the product was first built around, are explained on the main PPLI page; terms are defined in the PPLI glossary.
“Private placement life insurance” is a market name, not a Singapore legal category. No MAS statute, notice or guideline uses the term. Under Singapore law such a contract is a life policy, usually an investment-linked one, and it is regulated like any other: the insurer needs an MAS licence to carry on life business in Singapore (Insurance Act 1966 s 4), and anyone advising on it or arranging it needs a financial adviser’s licence or an exemption (Financial Advisers Act 2001 s 6). Which insurer issues it, and under which law, decides most of what follows.
Singapore tax
How Singapore taxes the portfolio, held directly or in a policy
Singapore taxes income, not capital, and exempts most of the investment income a private individual receives. For a resident individual the two columns below come out almost the same.
| Portfolio held directly | Same portfolio inside a policy | |
|---|---|---|
| Foreign dividends, interest and other foreign income received in Singapore | Exempt for a resident individual, unless received through a Singapore partnership (s 13(7A)(b)) | Not taxed on you while inside the policy |
| Dividends from Singapore companies | Exempt under the one-tier system (s 13(1)(za)) | Not taxed on you |
| Interest on deposits with approved Singapore banks | Exempt for individuals (s 13(1)(zd)) | Not taxed on you |
| Gains on shares and financial instruments | Generally not taxable as personal investments; trading can be taxable | Not taxed on you |
| Payout on surrender, maturity or death | Not applicable | Generally not taxable: IRAS lists insurance payouts as capital receipts |
| Estate at death | No estate duty for deaths on or after 15 February 2008 | No estate duty |
| Net Singapore tax effect of the policy | Nil | Nil, before charges; negative after them |
The exemptions are in the Income Tax Act 1947 s 13. Section 13(7A)(b) exempts foreign-sourced income received in Singapore by a resident individual on or after 1 January 2004, excluding income received through a partnership in Singapore; IRAS puts it plainly: “Generally, overseas income received in Singapore, including overseas income deposited into a Singapore bank account is not taxable” (IRAS). Section 13(1)(za) exempts dividends paid by Singapore-resident companies, and s 13(1)(zd) exempts interest an individual derives from deposits with an approved bank or a licensed finance company. On gains, IRAS says that profits from buying and selling shares and other financial instruments “are generally viewed as personal investments”, and it lists “payouts from insurance policies as they are capital receipts” among gains that are generally not taxable (IRAS). Estate duty applies only to deaths before 15 February 2008 (Estate Duty Act 1929 s 2A).
Three qualifications. First, the IRAS statement on insurance payouts is general and does not deal separately with investment-linked policies, and a policy held through a partnership or as part of a trade falls outside it. Second, the tax on gains from selling foreign assets received in Singapore under s 10L applies to entities in multinational groups, not to individuals, though a family holding company can be caught. Third, the Life Insurance Relief is no help: it is capped by reference to S$5,000, needs an insurer with a Singapore office or branch and excludes investment-linked policies where the investment is fundamental (IRAS). For completeness, the top resident rate is 24% on chargeable income above S$1,000,000, but for most private portfolio income it never comes into play. The arithmetic is on tax efficiency.
The tax that follows you
The other country, not Singapore
Most of the wealthy families who live in Singapore still sit inside a second tax system, through citizenship, a residence tail, domicile or a planned return. That system, not Singapore’s, decides whether a policy is worth its cost. The table summarises what our research found; the last column says whether our source is the statute or regulator (primary) or a law-firm, Big Four or press summary (secondary).
| Link | What still follows you to Singapore | What a compliant policy changes there | Our basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Worldwide income tax on citizens and green-card holders; no US-Singapore income tax treaty; 3.8% NIIT for citizens abroad; estate tax above the 2026 exclusion of US$15,000,000 | A policy meeting IRC s 7702 and s 817(h), without investor control: no tax on inside build-up, death benefit outside income (s 101(a)); 1% excise on premiums to a foreign insurer (s 4371); FBAR and Form 8938 | Primary; PFIC point is analysis |
| United Kingdom | Inheritance tax for long-term residents (10 of the previous 20 years) for 3 to 10 years after leaving; temporary non-residence of 5 years or less brings policy gains back into charge on return | An offshore bond: gross roll-up, tax only at chargeable events, time-apportionment relief for non-UK days (ITTOIA s 528); gains outside the four-year FIG regime | Primary |
| India | Worldwide tax only once ordinarily resident again, after the RNOR years | A policy taken while non-resident may be kept (FEMA); death benefits reported exempt; maturity exemption subject to premium conditions | Primary for residence and FEMA; secondary for the exemption |
| Mainland China | Worldwide tax on anyone domiciled in China through hukou, family or economic ties, even while abroad | Insurance compensation exempt (IIT Law art 4); treatment of surrender gains unclear, with 20% reportedly being charged on offshore policy gains | Primary; enforcement point is press reporting |
| Hong Kong | Territorial system; estate duty abolished from 11 February 2006 | Little or no effect at home | Primary for estate duty; secondary otherwise |
| Australia | CGT event I1 on departure; worldwide tax on return | Under product ruling PR 2023/21 (1 July 2023 to 30 June 2026), one product from an Irish issuer and its Singapore branch qualified under s 26AH, with gains disregarded for the original owner (s 118-300); the ruling excluded periods of non-residence | Primary, for that product |
| Indonesia | Worldwide tax on residents; citizens abroad can be non-resident | Insurer payments on life policies are not taxable objects; application to foreign insurers unconfirmed | Secondary |
| Malaysia | Territorial; foreign income of resident individuals exempt, reportedly to 31 December 2036 | Largely none while resident in Singapore | Secondary |
| France | Art 990 I on death benefits if the insured or a long-resident beneficiary is French-domiciled at death; exit tax on large holdings | Assurance-vie outside the exit tax; 990 I allowance of €152,500 per beneficiary, then 20% and 31.25% | Primary for 990 I; secondary otherwise |
| Germany | Unlimited inheritance tax for nationals for 5 years after leaving; extended reach for 10 years after a move to a low-tax country (§ 2 and § 4 AStG) | Policy gains taxed on payout under § 20(1)(6) EStG; an asset-management policy is taxed as if held directly | Secondary |
| Japan | Worldwide inheritance tax where a Japanese national heir or the deceased was domiciled in Japan within 10 years; exit tax at ¥100 million | Foreign-insurer death benefits deemed inherited but keep the ¥5 million per heir exemption | Primary for residence; secondary for the exemption |
Two points cut across the table. A policy only changes the home country’s result if it complies with that country’s rules, and those rules differ: a contract built for a US citizen will not usually suit the UK’s personal portfolio bond rules, and a German asset-management policy is taxed as if there were no policy at all. And a policy rarely removes an inheritance or estate tax on its own; the UK, German and Japanese rules above reach the wealth whether or not it sits in a policy. The short version for each country, with its catch, is on the home page chooser, and the research articles take the largest groups one by one: US citizens, families from the UK, families returning to India, mainland Chinese families and Australians. UK-connected readers will find the UK rules at length in the UK edition.
Regulation
What Singapore law regulates
Singapore regulates who may offer and advise on a life policy, who counts as an accredited investor, how an insurer checks the source of your wealth, what happens if an insurer fails, which policies can carry a statutory nomination, and what is reported to tax authorities.
Who may offer the policy
Carrying on life insurance business in Singapore needs an MAS licence (Insurance Act 1966 s 4). Section 8 goes further: no person may solicit insurance business for an insurer that is not licensed or otherwise entitled to do business in Singapore, and not even for the overseas branches or head office of a licensed one. “Soliciting” covers advertisements, and the definition of advertisement expressly includes the Internet. Under s 145 an act done outside Singapore with a substantial and reasonably foreseeable effect in Singapore is treated as done here where, done in Singapore, it would be an offence under s 4, 8, 70 or 75. Advising on a life policy, or arranging one, needs a financial adviser’s licence or exempt status (Financial Advisers Act 2001 s 6); licensed insurers are exempt financial advisers. This is why PPLI.com publishes research only, names no insurer as a choice, and points readers to firms on the MAS Financial Institutions Directory.
Accredited investors
An individual qualifies as an accredited investor if net personal assets exceed S$2 million (with the primary residence counted at no more than S$1 million of net equity), net financial assets exceed S$1 million, or income in the preceding 12 months is at least S$300,000 (Securities and Futures Act 2001 s 4A). Since 8 January 2019 the status is opt-in: you consent in writing to each financial institution and can withdraw. The consequence is that an adviser dealing with you is released from several client protections, which bank disclosures list as including product disclosure and the reasonable-basis rule for recommendations. Accredited investor status describes you, not the insurer: it does not make an unlicensed insurer licensed.
Source of wealth
Life insurers carry out customer due diligence under MAS Notice 314, including on beneficial owners and the parties to any trust. For politically exposed persons and higher-risk customers they must establish the source of wealth and the source of funds. Law-firm summaries of the revised notices in force from 1 July 2025 describe a wider definition of trust parties, which now reaches protectors, and a risk-based approach to how much evidence is needed (Rajah & Tann). In practice, expect to document how the wealth was built and where the premium comes from, more heavily if a trust or company holds the policy.
If the insurer fails
Membership of the Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme, run by SDIC, is compulsory for insurers licensed to carry on direct life business. For an insurer incorporated abroad, only policies issued by its Singapore branch are covered (SDIC FAQ). The caps are S$500,000 of guaranteed death benefit and S$100,000 of guaranteed surrender value per life per insurer, and investment-linked benefits that follow the value of the underlying assets are not covered because they are not guaranteed (SDIC coverage). For a large investment-linked policy, the scheme protects little of the value even with a licensed insurer. A licensed insurer must also keep separate insurance funds for Singapore and offshore policies (s 16).
Nominations
The nomination rules in Part 3C of the Insurance Act 1966 apply only to a “relevant policy”: issued by a licensed insurer, governed by Singapore law, providing death benefits and insuring the life of the policy owner (s 131). A trust nomination of a spouse or children under s 132 (formerly s 49L) takes the policy moneys out of the owner’s estate and away from the owner’s debts, though creditors can recover a sum equal to premiums paid with intent to defraud them (s 132(5)). A revocable nomination under s 133 names anyone but gives no creditor protection. The Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966 preserves Insurance Act nominations for Muslims (s 111(2)). A policy from an insurer not licensed in Singapore, or governed by foreign law, is not a relevant policy. See trust and revocable nominations.
Reporting
Singapore’s CRS Regulations came into operation on 1 January 2017 and treat cash value insurance contracts as financial accounts; Singapore has exchanged account information since September 2018 (IRAS CRS). Singapore’s Model 1 FATCA agreement with the United States entered into force on 18 March 2015 (IRAS FATCA). A policy from an insurer abroad is reported, if at all, by that insurer under its own country’s rules. See what CRS and FATCA report.
Licensed or abroad
A Singapore-licensed policy and a policy issued abroad
Two facts decide the Singapore treatment: whether MAS has licensed the insurer, and whether Singapore law governs the policy. The table separates the three combinations a family is likely to meet.
| Licensed insurer, Singapore law | Licensed insurer, foreign law | Insurer not licensed in Singapore | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insurer | Licensed by MAS for direct life business | Licensed by MAS | Not licensed in Singapore |
| Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme | Covered within the caps; investment-linked values not covered | Covered within the caps if issued in Singapore (for a foreign insurer, by its Singapore branch), on SDIC’s description; investment-linked values not covered | Not covered |
| Statutory nominations (ss 132 and 133) | Available | Not available: not a relevant policy | Not available: not a relevant policy |
| Creditor protection | Under a s 132 trust nomination, subject to s 132(5) and insolvency claw-backs | Depends on the governing law, any trust and Singapore insolvency law | Depends on the governing law, any trust and Singapore insolvency law |
| Offering it in Singapore | Through the insurer and licensed or exempt advisers | Through the licensed insurer in Singapore; no one may solicit for its overseas branches or head office (s 8(2)) | No one may solicit for the insurer in Singapore (s 8(1)) |
| Reporting | By the insurer to IRAS under CRS and FATCA | By the insurer to IRAS under CRS and FATCA | By the insurer under its own country’s rules, where they apply |
Many families arrive in Singapore already holding a policy issued abroad. What they should know is what that policy does not have here: no scheme protection, no statutory nomination and, for its protection against creditors, only what its own law and any trust around it provide, read against Singapore’s insolvency rules. Divorce is a separate question: Singapore courts have treated insurance policies as matrimonial assets. Both are covered on asset protection, and the protection schemes of the countries that issue policies internationally on jurisdictions.
Six Singapore households, two ways of holding the same money
Hypothetical cases, individual owners resident in Singapore, rules as at 27 September 2026. The policy loses in two of them.
Against the policy
A family whose only tax home is Singapore
Held directly
A S$10,000,000 portfolio of foreign funds and Singapore deposits pays, in most years, no Singapore tax at all.
Inside the policy
The same portfolio pays S$60,000 to S$120,000 a year in policy charges at 0.6% to 1.2%, and saves no Singapore tax. Any case for the policy has to come from succession or a future move.
A US citizen who has lived here for twenty years
Held directly
US tax every year on worldwide investment income, up to 40.8% on ordinary income including the 3.8% NIIT, and non-US funds held directly can be PFICs, with their own reporting.
Inside the policy
A policy meeting IRC s 7702 and s 817(h), with no investor control, defers US tax on the build-up and pays a death benefit outside US income tax. The cost includes the 1% excise on premiums and full FBAR and Form 8938 reporting.
A British family who left after fifteen years
Held directly
Fifteen years of UK residence mean a five-year inheritance tax tail after leaving. Foreign portfolio income is generally outside UK income tax while they are non-resident.
Inside the policy
An offshore bond grows without UK tax and, if they return, time apportionment removes the non-UK days from the gain. It does not shorten the inheritance tax tail, and returning within five years can bring gains back into charge.
An Indian family planning to go home
Held directly
Foreign income becomes taxable in India once they are ordinarily resident again, after the RNOR years, and foreign assets must be reported.
Inside the policy
A policy taken while non-resident may be kept under FEMA, and death benefits are reported exempt. A large single premium may not meet the maturity exemption’s premium conditions, so timing within the RNOR years matters.
Assets in Singapore, London and Jakarta
Held directly
Each country may need its own grant. A Singapore court reseals only Commonwealth or gazetted grants, so some foreign grants mean a fresh Singapore application.
Inside the policy
A Singapore-licensed, Singapore-law policy with a trust nomination pays the nominees through the trustees, outside the estate. A policy issued abroad pays under its own terms and law.
Against the policy
A founder who wants his company shares inside
Held directly
Dividends and gains are treated as the founder’s own, which in Singapore usually means untaxed.
Inside the policy
Home systems that tax a policy lightly do so only if the owner does not control the investments: the US investor control doctrine, the UK personal portfolio bond rules and the German treatment of asset-management policies all look through. Singapore gives nothing in exchange.
Who chooses the investments
Singapore’s own tax does not care who picks the assets inside a policy, because it barely taxes the assets either way. The countries that tax you may care a great deal. Under US law, a policyholder who directs a separate account’s investments can be treated as owning them and taxed currently (Rev. Rul. 2003-91; Webber v Commissioner, 2015). The UK taxes a policy whose holder can select its assets as a personal portfolio bond. Germany taxes an asset-management policy as if the assets were held directly. The general doctrine is explained on the main PPLI page; what that means for a Singapore resident, and what a policy can hold, is in who picks the investments and on investment flexibility.
What it costs, and what it has to earn
A policy carries its own charges on top of the investment costs: the insurer’s administration and policy charges, the cost of any life cover, custody and the manager. They are the price of the contract, and they vary too much between insurers for one figure to mean anything; the tool below uses 0.6% to 1.2% a year as working assumptions only. For a Singapore-only resident nothing comes back in Singapore tax, so the charge is a straight reduction in return. The policy can only pay for itself by removing a tax that another country would otherwise charge every year, or through a succession or portability benefit that you value above its cost. More on the economics is at PPLI costs and economics, and the PPLI Break-Even instrument models it in more detail.
Your inputs
Break-even: charge against tax removed
Held directly
S$13,266,489
Growing at 5.00% a year, less a tax drag of 0.00%.
Inside the policy
S$11,384,773
Growing at 5.00% a year, less policy charges of 0.80%.
| Difference at the end, in favour of the policy | -S$1,881,715 |
| Extra gross return the policy portfolio needs each year to match | 0.80 percentage points |
| Tax drag elsewhere at which the policy breaks even | 0.80% a year |
On these numbers the policy ends S$1,881,715 behind. With no tax removed elsewhere, the policy portfolio would have to earn 0.80 percentage points a year more than the same assets held directly just to draw level.
The formula
Held directly: value = premium x (1 + return - tax drag) ^ years
Inside the policy: value = premium x (1 + return - policy charge) ^ years
Break-even: tax drag removed elsewhere = policy charge
Extra return needed with no tax removed = policy charge, every yearHow to estimate the tax drag for another country: take the part of the return that country taxes each year and multiply by its rate. A hypothetical US citizen with a portfolio yielding 4% in interest, taxed at 40.8% (37% plus the 3.8% NIIT), loses about 1.63% of value a year held directly. What the model leaves out, so you can judge it: any tax the other country charges when the policy pays out, the 1% US excise on premiums, withholding tax on the underlying investments, fixed costs, and succession value. It treats the charge as a straight deduction from return.
Read the break-even line first. For a Singapore-only resident the drag is nil and the policy loses by the charge compounded, every year. The number that matters is the second country’s tax, and only if the policy is built to that country’s rules.
What the policy does not do for a Singapore resident
It does not reduce Singapore tax for someone whose only tax home is Singapore, for the reasons in the table above.
It is not protected in full if the insurer fails. The Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme covers guaranteed benefits within caps and not investment-linked values, and a policy from an insurer not licensed in Singapore is outside it altogether (if a life insurer fails).
It does not always carry a Singapore nomination. Only a relevant policy under s 131 can, and only a s 132 trust nomination keeps the proceeds from the owner’s creditors.
It is not beyond creditors or a divorce court by default. Transactions at an undervalue can be unwound within 3 years of a bankruptcy application, preferences to associates within 2 years and other preferences within 1 year (IRDA 2018 ss 361 to 363), and a transaction meant to put assets beyond creditors can be set aside with no time limit (s 438). On divorce, insurance policies can be matrimonial assets under the Women’s Charter 1961 s 112 (WRX v WRY [2024] SGHC(A) 22; XKT v XKU [2025] SGHCF 27). See asset protection.
It is not hidden from tax authorities. It is private from the public, not from CRS or FATCA reporting (privacy and reporting).
The five benefits, read for a Singapore resident
Tax efficiency
The other country’s tax
Why Singapore tax barely moves, where a second system does, and a calculator for the charges.
Succession planning
One contract, named beneficiaries
Nominations, probate across borders, intestacy and Muslim estates.
Asset protection
Creditors, divorce and insurer failure
What s 132 protects, what insolvency law can unwind, and what the scheme pays.
Privacy and reporting
Who can see the policy
CRS, FATCA and the public record, for a Singapore resident.
Investment flexibility
What the policy may hold
Investor control and the home-country rules that decide it.
Questions
Private placement life insurance in Singapore: questions
What is private placement life insurance in Singapore?
A market name for a life policy written for one family, usually for a single large premium, whose value follows a portfolio the insurer holds against it. It is not a Singapore legal category: no MAS statute, notice or guideline uses the term. Under Singapore law it is a life policy, usually investment-linked, and the insurer needs an MAS licence to carry on life business in Singapore.
Does a policy reduce Singapore tax for a Singapore resident?
No, not for someone whose only tax home is Singapore. A resident individual generally pays no Singapore tax on foreign income received here (Income Tax Act 1947 s 13(7A)), on one-tier dividends (s 13(1)(za)) or on approved-bank interest (s 13(1)(zd)), and gains on investments are generally not taxable. The policy adds charges and removes no Singapore tax. Its value lies in another country’s tax, in succession or in portability.
How is a policy payout taxed in Singapore?
IRAS lists payouts from insurance policies among capital receipts that are generally not taxable, and there is no estate duty for deaths on or after 15 February 2008. The IRAS statement is general and does not deal separately with investment-linked policies. A policy held through a Singapore partnership or as part of a trade can be treated differently.
Who can offer a life policy to a Singapore resident?
An insurer licensed by MAS, directly or through a licensed or exempt financial adviser. Insurance Act 1966 s 8 bars anyone from soliciting insurance business in Singapore for an insurer that is not licensed here, or for the overseas branches or head office of a licensed one, and advertisements on the Internet count. Check any firm on the MAS Financial Institutions Directory.
Do I need to be an accredited investor?
Accredited investor status is defined in the Securities and Futures Act 2001 s 4A: net personal assets above S$2 million (the home counting for at most S$1 million), net financial assets above S$1 million, or income of at least S$300,000 in the preceding 12 months. Since 8 January 2019 you must opt in with each institution. Opting in releases an adviser from several client protections. It says nothing about whether the insurer is licensed in Singapore.
Can I make a Singapore nomination on a policy issued abroad?
No. The nomination rules apply only to a relevant policy under Insurance Act 1966 s 131: issued by a licensed insurer, governed by Singapore law, providing death benefits and insuring the policy owner’s own life. A policy from an insurer not licensed in Singapore, or governed by foreign law, pays under its own terms, and any protection comes from its governing law or a trust.
Is the policy protected if the insurer fails?
Only within the Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme, and only with an MAS-licensed insurer. The caps are S$500,000 of guaranteed death benefit and S$100,000 of guaranteed surrender value per life per insurer. Investment-linked values that follow the underlying assets are not covered. A policy from an insurer not licensed in Singapore is outside the scheme.
Can creditors or a divorce court reach the policy?
They can. Only a trust nomination under s 132 on a relevant policy keeps the proceeds from the owner’s debts, and even then creditors can recover premiums paid to defraud them. Bankruptcy law can unwind transactions at an undervalue within 3 years and, under IRDA s 438, transactions meant to defeat creditors with no time limit. Singapore courts have treated insurance policies as matrimonial assets on divorce.
Sources and authorities
Read as at 27 September 2026. Statute text was read on Singapore Statutes Online. Links marked secondary are law-firm, Big Four, bank or press summaries.
- Income Tax Act 1947 s 13: s 13(7A) (foreign-sourced income), s 13(1)(za) (one-tier dividends), s 13(1)(zd) (approved-bank interest); s 10L (foreign-asset gains of group entities).
- IRAS: gains from sale of property, shares and financial instruments; IRAS: income received from overseas; IRAS: dividends; IRAS: interest; IRAS: individual income tax rates; IRAS: Life Insurance Relief.
- Estate Duty Act 1929 s 2A.
- Insurance Act 1966 s 4, s 8, s 16 and s 145; ss 131 and 132 and s 133 (Singapore Statutes Online).
- Financial Advisers Act 2001 s 6 and Second Schedule (Singapore Statutes Online).
- Securities and Futures Act 2001 s 4A (Singapore Statutes Online); Allen & Gledhill on the opt-in regime (secondary); Julius Baer accredited investor disclosure (secondary).
- MAS Notice 314: Rajah & Tann, 11 July 2025 (secondary); Deloitte (secondary).
- SDIC: Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme FAQ; SDIC: coverage limits; MAS Financial Institutions Directory.
- Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966 s 111; Probate and Administration Act 1934 s 47.
- Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 ss 361 to 363 and ss 329 and 438; Women’s Charter 1961 s 112; WRX v WRY [2024] SGHC(A) 22; XKT v XKU [2025] SGHCF 27.
- CRS Regulations 2016; IRAS: CRS; IRAS: FATCA.
- United States: IRS: US citizens abroad; IRS treaty list; IRC s 7702, s 817, s 101, s 1411, s 4371; Rev. Proc. 2025-32; IRS: estate and gift tax; National Law Review on Webber (secondary).
- United Kingdom: IHTA 1984 s 6A; gov.uk: long-term UK residents; ITTOIA 2005 s 528 and s 465B; RFIG45100.
- India, China and Hong Kong: Income Tax Department NRI FAQ; FEM (Insurance) Regulations 2015; Schedule II summary (secondary); PRC Individual Income Tax Law; Implementing Regulations; The Standard, August 2026 (press); IRD: estate duty.
- Australia, Indonesia and Malaysia: ATO PR 2023/21; ATO: changing residency and CGT; DDTC (secondary); EY Malaysia (secondary).
- France, Germany and Japan: BOFiP BOI-TCAS-AUT-60; exit tax summary (secondary); Lorenz & Partners (secondary); § 20 EStG commentary (secondary); NTA 4138; foreign policies and Japanese inheritance tax (secondary).
Last updated: 27 September 2026. Our editorial standards describe how this material is checked and corrected.
Library · Singapore research
Where to go deeper
Nominations
Trust and revocable nominations in Singapore: what they cover and what they missSingapore research · YA 2026
Insurer failure
If a life insurer fails: the Policy Owners’ Protection Scheme and policies from abroadSingapore research · YA 2026
Investor control
Who picks the investments: investor control and what a policy can holdSingapore research · YA 2026
US citizens
US citizens in Singapore: what a US-compliant life policy changesSingapore research · YA 2026
Reporting
What CRS and FATCA report about a life policy held by a Singapore residentSingapore research · YA 2026
Probate
Assets in several countries: probate, resealing and where a life policy fitsSingapore research · YA 2026
Ask a research question
About a rule, a figure or a source on this page. We answer in general terms; we do not review personal circumstances, recommend products or arrange policies.
Ask a Questioninfo@ppli.com
Checked against Singapore primary sources: Singapore Statutes Online, IRAS, MAS, SDIC and the Family Justice Courts. For the home-country table: the IRS and US Code, HMRC and legislation.gov.uk, India’s Income Tax Department, China’s State Taxation Administration, the ATO, BOFiP and Japan’s National Tax Agency. Each statement is linked to its basis, and summaries taken from law firms or advisers are marked as such.
Last updated: 27 September 2026
Editorial standards
Editorial standards