Compare two hypothetical portfolio allocations using the same capital, horizon and tax rates. Inspect ending value, investment costs, taxes paid and the effect of a final sale. Think of it as a way to see how allocation assumptions play off each other. It will not pick a suitable portfolio for you or forecast markets. Start with the two presets, review every asset assumption, then test the holding period and tax rates. Spending, concentration risk and real-world taxable rebalancing are left out and need their own analysis.
The size of the portfolio is only one input. Before choosing an allocation, write down expected spending, known commitments, borrowing obligations, time horizons, existing concentrations and the investor’s tax position. Distinguish money needed on a fixed date from capital that can remain invested through a prolonged decline.
The trade-offs are concrete. An illiquid fund may conflict with a near-term payment. Reducing a concentrated position can trigger gain recognition. Keeping target weights may require sales. A useful investment policy states the liquidity requirement, concentration limits and who may authorize a change. The SEC’s asset allocation guidance explains why horizon and risk tolerance matter.
This comparison addresses one part of that process: the stated arithmetic of returns, costs and tax. It uses constant returns and no withdrawals. For spending and policy sensitivities, open the Wealth Profile. The parent Wealth Intelligence page explains how the tools fit together.
“After tax” tells you what a calculation includes; the return going into it is still an assumption. Check whether the result includes investment expenses, current tax, deferred gain, a final sale and withdrawals. The SEC’s fee illustration shows why recurring costs affect the capital left to compound.
The five amounts below illustrate one assumed $100,000 annual fixed charge divided by starting capital. The point is simply that a fixed cost weighs less as capital grows. These are not eligibility thresholds, and they say nothing about whether PPLI or a family office pays for itself in a given case. The comparison calculator itself uses proportional investment costs and leaves this fixed charge out.
A large holding in one issuer can expose a portfolio to that issuer’s fortunes. Diversification can reduce concentration risk, but it cannot guarantee against investment loss. The calculator’s Equity-heavy preset is an 85% public-equity sleeve. It does not model a single company or measure issuer-specific risk.
For a taxable sale, gain generally depends on amount realized less adjusted basis. A low-basis holding can therefore create a material tax bill when sold. Holding, staged sales, hedging, borrowing and charitable transfers have different cash, risk and legal consequences. Borrowing against a position adds interest and collateral requirements while leaving the investment exposure in place. Check transaction-specific treatment before comparing those paths.
Start a concentration analysis with the actual position, basis, sale restrictions, liquidity need and acceptable loss. Because this calculator sets basis equal to value at the start, it is not the right tool for an existing founder stake. An impending sale also belongs in liquidity event planning. The IRS explains capital gains, losses and holding periods.
The investor’s tax position, income character, gain recognition and ownership arrangement affect tax. The comparison holds rate assumptions constant between A and B so the difference reflects the chosen weights and their cost and tax characteristics together.
Use Tax Intelligence to examine rate sensitivity. Use Wealth Structure Intelligence for ownership and policy-cost questions. Putting assets in a trust or a policy does not, on its own, make them tax-exempt; the specific rules decide.
Private fund terms need their own review. A reported value is not always cash you can get at quickly. Private equity can require a multi-year holding period, and fund documents govern commitments, fees and distributions. Private credit may accrue income without paying the same amount in cash. Hedge fund tax character depends on instruments, turnover and the investor’s legal interest. No single net-return figure captures all of that.
The calculator uses a flat annual cost for each sleeve. It does not reproduce incentive allocations, high-water marks, capital calls, uncollected interest or redemption restrictions. For those questions, use Alternative Investment Intelligence, Hedge Fund X-Ray and Private Credit Real Yield. PPLI investment eligibility and investor control require a separate review.
The opening example uses $50 million for 20 years, with 40% ordinary and short-term rates, a 25% preferential rate and a 5-point addition to each. All asset assumptions and weights appear in the calculator. Balanced assumes 5.975% gross and ends at $114,542,314 before a final sale. Endowment assumes 8.01% gross and ends at $124,157,445. The difference is $9,615,131. It reflects different allocations, not tax savings from an otherwise identical portfolio.
Selecting a final sale applies the combined 30% preferential rate to remaining positive gains, leaving $106,830,245 and $118,544,843 respectively. It does not model special gain rates, actual tax lots or loss netting. Current taxes and investment costs are paid each year. Initial basis equals capital, after-tax income and recognized gain update basis, and the target-weight reset preserves pooled basis without calculating actual rebalancing taxes. Returns are constant; contributions, spending, inflation and risk are omitted.
Published by PPLI.com. Reviewed 17 September 2026. The comparison was checked across 150 preset, horizon and endpoint combinations, including equality, scaling and zero-tax cases. Its portfolio engine also passed the Wealth Profile model checks. These checks confirm the arithmetic; they are not a sign-off by a named professional. See editorial standards and the Privacy Policy.
These sources support the legal and investment distinctions on this page. The hypothetical asset returns are our own assumptions, and eligibility to invest is set by each offering. Regulation D offerings and private funds have offering-specific restrictions; the dollar examples above are not access thresholds.
Send your question with the relevant page link, leaving out anything confidential. Sending an inquiry does not create a professional engagement, and we cannot commit to a response time.
Ask about PPLIRead our Privacy Policy before submitting. Share only the information needed to describe your question; do not include medical records or account credentials.