Where Wealth Moves in 2026: Henley Scores and Carrier Domicile
Wealth now shops for countries the way it once shopped for stocks, and in 2026 the market has a published index. Henley & Partners' new Wealth Mobility Competitiveness Score ranks jurisdictions by their overall attractiveness to relocating capital, and the leaderboard reads like a map of the decade's power shift: the United Arab Emirates first at 85.3, Singapore at 79.5, New Zealand at 75.8, and the Cayman Islands at 74.3. At the other end of the table, Henley describes the United Kingdom, Germany, and France as jurisdictions under pressure, a diplomatic phrase for countries whose tax and policy environments are pushing wealth out faster than their courts and culture can pull it in.
The ranking will steer real decisions this year. Before it does, a distinction needs to be drawn sharply, because the industry routinely blurs it: where a family lives and where its insurance structures are domiciled are two different questions, answered by two different sets of criteria. The families that plan well treat them separately. The families that conflate them buy the wrong structure in the right country, or the right structure in the wrong one.
What the Score Actually Measures
Henley's index aggregates the factors that make a jurisdiction hospitable to arriving wealth: tax treatment, residence and citizenship pathways, legal stability, safety, lifestyle, connectivity. It measures, in short, the quality of a place as a home for a wealthy family. The UAE's 85.3 reflects zero personal income tax, aggressive golden-visa expansion, and a decade of institutional investment. Singapore's 79.5 rests on rule of law and its position as Asia's wealth hub. New Zealand at 75.8 trades on stability and distance from the world's problems. Cayman's 74.3 is notable precisely because it scores as a place to live, not merely a place to register entities.
What the score does not measure is the quality of a jurisdiction as a domicile for insurance contracts: the strength of its policyholder-protection statutes, segregated account law, regulatory depth in private placement business, carrier ecosystem, and treaty posture. Those attributes correlate loosely at best with lifestyle attractiveness. Nobody relocates a family to Bermuda for the schools or builds a life around a carrier's registered office.
Two Decisions, Two Criteria Sets
The residence decision is personal and fiscal: where the family will actually live, what its members will pay on income and gains, what succession law will apply, what the passport portfolio should look like. The domicile decision is structural: which jurisdiction's insurance law will govern the family's largest financial contract for the next half century.
Run the comparison concretely. A family relocating to Dubai enjoys the UAE's zero income tax as residents. That fact alone says nothing about where their PPLI policy should be issued. The policy wants a domicile with generations of insurance jurisprudence, statutory asset segregation, and carriers experienced with the family's asset classes and reporting obligations, which typically points such a family toward established insurance centers: Bermuda and Cayman for globally oriented and US-connected wealth, jurisdictions we examine in our Bermuda analysis and our Cayman Islands review, Luxembourg for European exposure, Singapore for Asian structures, as covered in our work on Singapore. The residence delivers the daily tax result; the domicile delivers the fifty-year legal architecture. They only occasionally coincide.
Designing for the Second Move
Henley's data carry a subtler lesson: mobility is no longer a single event. Families that moved once are statistically likelier to move again, as regimes change, children scatter, and the pressure jurisdictions tighten further. Planning should therefore assume not one relocation but a sequence, and that assumption transforms the domicile question.
A policy domiciled where the family happens to live is hostage to the next move: local products often lose their advantages, or their compliance logic, when the policyholder becomes tax-resident elsewhere. A policy domiciled in a dedicated insurance center, by contrast, is built for exactly this: carriers in the leading domiciles maintain the multi-jurisdictional expertise to keep a contract compliant as its owner crosses borders, and contracts can be drafted from inception for the three or four countries a family plausibly inhabits over a generation. Domicile quality, in other words, is what makes personal mobility structurally survivable. The interaction between a specific passport portfolio, a specific residence sequence, and a specific domicile's rules is exactly the analysis that belongs with qualified cross-border counsel.
Reading the Pressure List
The under-pressure designations matter as much as the podium. The UK's placement follows the non-dom abolition and the largest millionaire outflow in the world; Germany and France face their own combination of fiscal appetite and political volatility. For families still resident in those countries, the practical takeaway is not necessarily departure. It is optionality: structures established now, while the family can still plan calmly, that would function equally well after any future move. Portable wrappers, trusts and insurance contracts in strong domiciles, are precisely that optionality, the theme running through our jurisdictions coverage.
Henley has given the market a scoreboard for where wealth wants to live. No one publishes the equivalent scoreboard for where wealth structures want to live, but the criteria are knowable, and the two lists are not the same. Families who read only the first list will follow the crowd to the right address with the wrong architecture. The durable outcome belongs to those who answer both questions on purpose.
PPLI.com serves as the global center for private placement life insurance, working with families and their advisors in seven languages. To take your question further, request a confidential consultation.