21matters on the record across its booking centres, 2014 to 2026
2.6/5127 UHNW client ratings across its booking centres
The editor's opinion
Why J.P. Morgan rates 1.4 out of 5
J.P. Morgan rates 1.4 out of 5. The figure combines the ratings of its six rated booking centres (the United States, two stars; Switzerland, three stars; Luxembourg, one star; Hong Kong, one star; Singapore, one star; Jersey, one star), each weighted by the number of UHNW client ratings it has received, so a centre where more families bank counts for more. Switzerland is the strongest at three stars; Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Singapore and Jersey are the weakest at one star. Its booking entities carry 21 matters on the record, the most recent in 2026; each is listed below with the centre it concerns. Across its booking centres, 127 UHNW client ratings average 2.6 out of 5.
Noam Cohen, Editor, Bank IntelligenceReviewed 6 November 2026, Q4 2026 edition. Each booking centre is rated on its own file, from the public record and what clients and their advisers tell us in confidence. The overall rating brings those ratings together; retail products, branches and apps play no part.
Where J.P. Morgan stands out
Custody assets are protected by statute in the booking centre, with conditions a family should read. United States, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Hong Kong
Deposits are covered by a statutory protection scheme. United States, Switzerland, Singapore and Jersey
A full range of private banking services is published for this booking unit. United States
Most fees are published. United States
The bank states publicly what it does with third-party payments. United States and Switzerland
The custody terms are public and address most of what a family needs to know. Switzerland
A broad range of private banking services is published for this booking unit. Switzerland
Deposits are covered by a protection scheme, with limits. Luxembourg and Hong Kong
Ownership and control are fully public. Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Singapore and Jersey
No politically exposed person holds a significant stake. Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Singapore and Jersey
Custody assets are segregated by statute and sit outside the bank's own estate. Jersey
What to weigh
Serious adverse findings against this licence holder in the last ten years. All centres
The same kind of failure has recurred. United States, Hong Kong and Jersey
The last adverse finding is very recent. United States, Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Jersey
Only a summary of the custody terms is public. United States, Luxembourg and Hong Kong
Remediation of past findings is not documented. United States, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Jersey
Whether independent asset managers are served by a dedicated desk is not published. United States and Switzerland
The last adverse finding is recent. Switzerland
No fee schedule is published; pricing is given on request. Switzerland, Luxembourg and Jersey
Almost no private banking services are published for this booking unit. Luxembourg and Jersey
Only part of the private banking range is published for this booking unit. Hong Kong and Singapore
The record distinguishes the Singapore bond-pricing case from other actions against the licence holder, including a U.S. censure in October 2026. Singapore
Only part of the tariff is published. Singapore
The legal treatment of custody assets at this booking centre remains undocumented in this review. Singapore
United States · JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association43 client ratings · 34% of the weight
Switzerland · J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA2 client ratings · 1% of the weight
Luxembourg · J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg Branch16 client ratings · 13% of the weight
Hong Kong · JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Hong Kong Branch31 client ratings · 24% of the weight
Singapore · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore Branch24 client ratings · 19% of the weight
Jersey · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jersey Branch11 client ratings · 9% of the weight
PPLI.com rating, weighted across the centres1.4
Each booking centre keeps its own rating, set on its own file. The overall rating is the average of those ratings, weighted by the number of UHNW client ratings each centre has received. A centre whose rating is still in preparation is shown but not counted.
The rating expresses the opinion of PPLI.com on the date shown. It is not a statement of fact about the bank, not a credit rating, not a forecast of failure and not investment advice.
The booking centres
J.P. Morgan in 6 booking centres
Each booking centre is a separate legal entity, with its own licence, deposit protection, services and fees, and keeps its own PPLI.com rating. Everything on file for them is brought together on this page; open a centre for its own file.
What regulators, prosecutors and courts have decided against the booking entities of J.P. Morgan, gathered from the files of all its booking centres, with the status, the amounts as published and a link to the original document. Each entry names the centre it concerns. Claims and investigations still under way are marked as open.
20262 October 2026
Censure for letting a disqualified person take part in security-based swap dealing
The SEC found that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC wilfully allowed a statutorily disqualified associated person to effect or be involved in security-based swap transactions and had no system to supervise that person. On 2 October 2026 it censured both and ordered them to cease and desist; no penalty was imposed (Exchange Act Release No. 106569).
Penalties for misreporting credit risk and credit valuation adjustment risk-weighted assets
The European Central Bank imposed two administrative penalties totalling EUR 12.18 million on J.P. Morgan SE, the legal entity of which the Luxembourg branch is part, on 19 February 2026 for misreporting capital requirements between 2019 and 2024. For 15 consecutive quarters the bank misclassified corporate exposures and applied too low a risk weight, a breach rated severe, and for 21 consecutive quarters it excluded transactions from CVA risk-weighted assets, rated moderately severe, with serious negligence and internal controls that did not detect the errors in time.
Administrative fine for failing to file suspicious transaction reports without undue delay
BaFin, the German home supervisor, fined J.P. Morgan SE, the legal entity of which the Luxembourg branch is part, EUR 45 million, the largest fine it has imposed on a financial institution, after finding that the bank culpably breached its supervisory obligations. Its internal processes meant that suspicious transaction reports between October 2021 and September 2022 were not filed without undue delay, and the fine notice became final on 30 October 2025.
Penalty order for failing to prevent aggravated money laundering of 1MDB and PetroSaudi funds
The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland convicted J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA by summary penalty order on 22 August 2025 and fined it CHF 3 million for failing, between 7 October 2014 and 21 July 2015, to take the organisational measures needed to prevent aggravated money laundering. In that period the bank received or executed 43 transfers of funds from offences by the managers of PetroSaudi, including 34 transfers abroad of about CHF 174 million in total. Proceedings on facts before 2 October 2014 were abandoned, no compensatory claim was ordered because 1MDB is to be compensated MYR 1.4 billion, and the order is final after both parties waived appeal.
MAS civil penalty for failing to prevent or detect relationship managers' misconduct in OTC bond pricing disclosures
MAS imposed a civil penalty of S$2.4 million on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for failing to prevent or detect misconduct by relationship managers who made inaccurate or incomplete disclosures in 24 OTC bond transactions between November 2018 and September 2019, charging spreads above agreed rates. JPM admitted liability under section 236C of the SFA, paid the penalty, refunded overcharged fees and strengthened pricing controls; reviews of the individual RMs were ongoing.
The bank has refunded the overcharged fees to affected clients.
Refund of overcharged fees to affected clients; strengthened pricing frameworks and internal controls.
Reprimand for late freezing and reporting of sanctioned assets and gaps in ongoing investor screening
The CSSF reprimanded J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg Branch on 14 October 2024, in a decision published on 22 January 2025, for freezing late and reporting late to the Ministry of Finance the assets of a person listed under Regulation (EU) 269/2014, and for several months without ongoing screening of certain fund investors and related parties where the bank acts as transfer researcher. It also found serious organisational and internal-control deficiencies, treated self-disclosure, cooperation, the absence of prior breaches and remediation as mitigating factors, and imposed no fine.
Enforcement action: inadequate trade surveillance for market abuse, 2014 to 2023
The OCC assessed a civil money penalty of USD 250 million against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (AA-EC-2023-49) and issued a consent order (AA-EC-2023-50) over gaps in its trade surveillance programme, after weak governance of trading venues and data controls left trading on at least 30 global venues unmonitored between 2014 and 2023. The Federal Reserve fined the parent, JPMorgan Chase & Co., about USD 98.2 million over the same conduct.
a civil money penalty in the total amount of two hundred fifty million dollars ($250,000,000.00)
On 30 March 2026 the OCC terminated its consent order of 14 March 2024 (AA-ENF-2026-17); the Federal Reserve terminated its parallel action against the parent on 4 December 2025. The penalties remain part of the record.
Order over unreported and misreported swap transactions
The CFTC found that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and two affiliates failed to report or misreported more than 40 million swap transactions, and on 29 September 2023 ordered a civil monetary penalty of USD 15 million (CFTC Docket No. 23-61). The respondents admitted the facts.
Respondents shall jointly and severally pay a civil monetary penalty in the amount of fifteen-million dollars ($15,000,000).
Order over unreported short-dated FX swap transactions
The CFTC found that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and two affiliates failed to report about 2.1 million short-dated FX swap transactions between September 2015 and February 2020, and on 5 July 2022 ordered a civil monetary penalty of USD 850,000 (CFTC Docket No. 22-20).
Respondents shall pay, jointly and severally, a civil monetary penalty in the amount of eight hundred fifty thousand dollars ($850,000)
Order over business messages on unapproved channels and the records lost
The CFTC found that staff of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and two affiliates widely used unapproved communication methods whose records were not kept, and on 17 December 2021 ordered a civil monetary penalty of USD 75 million, payable jointly and severally (CFTC Docket No. 22-07). The respondents admitted the facts.
Respondents shall pay, jointly and severally, a civil monetary penalty in the amount of seventy-five million US dollars ($75,000,000),
Civil money penalty for inadequate internal controls and audit over the fiduciary business
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency assessed a USD 250 million civil money penalty against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. on 24 November 2020. It found that the bank failed to maintain adequate internal controls and internal audit over its fiduciary activities, and that its risk management lacked a sound framework to avoid conflicts of interest.
Deferred prosecution agreement: wire fraud schemes in precious metals and US Treasuries futures (spoofing)
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC entered a three-party DPA on two counts of wire fraud for spoofing schemes in precious metals futures (about 2008 to 2016) and US Treasuries (about 2008 to 2016), paying over USD 920 million in criminal penalty, disgorgement and victim compensation. The the US Department of Justice credits payments under the separate CFTC (about USD 436 million civil penalty) and SEC (USD 35 million, against JPMS) settlements; the CFTC and SEC amounts are components of, not additions to, the USD 920 million. The the US Department of Justice release names three parties to the deferred prosecution agreement: JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The USD 920 million is the total paid under the agreement by the group, not a sum imposed on the bank alone.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMorgan), a New York, New York-based global banking and financial services firm,
The three-year term of the deferred prosecution agreement ended in September 2023 and the court dismissed the case with prejudice on 29 March 2024. The CFTC's order of the same day on the same conduct also named JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (CFTC Docket No. 20-69).
Reprimand, HK$12,500,000 pecuniary penalty and independent review order for AMLO contraventions (customer due diligence, periodic reviews, wire transfer originator information), April 2012 to February 2014
The Monetary Authority found the branch contravened six AMLO provisions: CDD procedures that did not require beneficial owner verification, business relationships established before checks were complete, 259 of 495 high-risk customers in related groups not reviewed annually, and some outgoing wire transfers sent without originator names. It reprimanded the branch, ordered a HK$12,500,000 penalty and required an independent external advisor's report on remediation. The branch had self-identified some deficiencies.
has ordered JPMorgan Hong Kong to pay a pecuniary penalty of HK$12,500,000
Extensive remedial work and strengthened control functions; independent external advisor report ordered (wire transfer deficiencies excluded from the order's scope).
Order over American depositary receipts released without the underlying shares
The SEC found that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary, negligently pre-released American depositary receipts to brokers that did not own the underlying shares, and on 26 December 2018 ordered disgorgement of about USD 71.0 million, interest of about USD 14.4 million and a penalty of about USD 49.7 million (Securities Act Release No. 10600).
JPMorgan shall, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement of $71,041,225.47
Settlement of 87 apparent breaches of Cuban, Iranian and proliferation sanctions, with a Finding of Violation
The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control settled with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for USD 5,263,171 on 5 October 2018 over 87 apparent violations of the Cuban, Iranian and weapons-of-mass-destruction proliferator sanctions arising from net settlement payments, of which only a very small portion appears attributable to interests of airlines at times on the SDN List. OFAC also issued a Finding of Violation covering 85 transactions totalling USD 46,127.04 between 4 August 2011 and 29 April 2014 and eight accounts the bank maintained for six SDN-listed customers.
Order over attempted manipulation of the US dollar ISDAFIX benchmark
The CFTC found that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. attempted to manipulate the US dollar ISDAFIX benchmark swap rates, and on 18 June 2018 ordered it to cease and desist and to pay a civil monetary penalty of USD 65 million (CFTC Docket No. 18-15).
Respondent shall pay a civil monetary penalty of sixty five million U.S. dollars ($65,000,000)
Consent order over inaccurate checking-account information supplied to consumer reporting companies
The CFPB found that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. furnished inaccurate checking-account information to consumer reporting companies without reasonable accuracy and dispute procedures, and on 2 August 2017 ordered a civil money penalty of USD 4.6 million (2017-CFPB-0015). The order ran for five years and has expired.
Respondent must pay a civil money penalty of $4.6 million to the Bureau.
FINMA proceedings concluded: serious breach of anti-money laundering regulations in 1MDB-related relationships
FINMA concluded at the end of June 2017 (published 21 December 2017) that J.P. Morgan (Switzerland) Ltd seriously breached anti-money laundering regulations in relationships and transactions linked to 1MDB booked in Switzerland, including crediting hundreds of millions of US dollars from 1MDB to a personal account without adequate questioning. FINMA appointed a monitor to review controls with a focus on high-risk transactions and referred the case to the US OCC. No fine, no business restriction and no proceedings against individuals, citing good cooperation. The ruling was not appealed.
FINMA's ruling, which has not been appealed, is final and binding.
FINMA-appointed monitor to review and continuously oversee the bank's AML controls.
Consent order over higher broker fees charged to African American and Hispanic mortgage borrowers
In a consent order filed on 20 January 2017 in the Southern District of New York (United States v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), the bank agreed to pay USD 53 million, including a civil penalty of USD 55,000, to resolve claims that African American and Hispanic borrowers were charged higher broker rates and fees on wholesale mortgage loans than similar white borrowers.
The consent order includes monetary relief of $53 million which includes a civil penalty of $55,000.
Reprimand and HK$2.6 million fine for offering offshore listed index options without the required Type 2 and/or Type 5 registration (2003 to 2015) and late reporting
The SFC reprimanded JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited for a combined HK$5.6 million. The bank's share, HK$2.6 million, related to offering certain offshore listed index options to clients from 1 April 2003 to 22 July 2015 without the required registrations and to reporting the breach about five months after discovery. The bank stopped offering the products.
SFC reprimands and fines two JP Morgan entities HK$5.6 million for regulatory breaches
JPMCB stopped offering the offshore listed index options; group position reporting system fixed.
Final notice: failings in G10 spot FX trading controls (five-bank settlement)
In the November 2014 five-bank FX settlement the FCA fined JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. GBP 222,166,000 (USD 352 million) for failing to control business practices on its London G10 spot FX voice trading desk between 1 January 2008 and 15 October 2013, after a 30% settlement discount. The FCA release notes parallel CFTC penalties and an OCC penalty of USD 700 million across Citibank and JPMorgan; those are separate and must not be added to the FCA figure.
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. £222,166,000 ($352 million), The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc £217,000,000 ($344 million)
Matters concerning other entities in the group (2)
202431 October 2024
Five settled actions over misleading disclosures, conflicted product recommendations and prohibited trades
On 31 October 2024 the SEC settled five actions with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., US sister companies of the Swiss bank under JPMorgan Chase & Co., for more than USD 151 million in penalties and investor payments. The SEC found that J.P. Morgan Securities misled investors in Conduit private funds, favoured its own Portfolio Management Program without full disclosure of its financial incentives and recommended costlier clone mutual funds over identical ETFs, and that J.P. Morgan Investment Management caused USD 4.3 billion of prohibited joint transactions and 65 prohibited principal trades of about USD 8.2 billion.
Shown for context only: the decision concerns J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc, not J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA, and does not count towards the rating of the booking centre or of the group.
Acquisition of First Republic Bank deposits and substantially all assets from the FDIC as receiver
First Republic Bank was closed on 1 May 2023 by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, and the FDIC was appointed receiver. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association assumed all deposits and substantially all assets under a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share on single-family residential and commercial loans. As of 13 April 2023 the bank had about USD 229.1 billion in assets and USD 103.9 billion in deposits; the estimated cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund was about USD 13 billion. This is a failure and resolution, not a conduct finding.
acquirer and successor (purchase and assumption)
First Republic Bank, San Francisco, California, was closed today by the California Department of Financial Protection
What clients meet at J.P. Morgan across its booking centres, read from complaint registers, ombudsman decisions and court records, independent reporting and what clients and their advisers tell PPLI.com in confidence. Announcements by the bank, awards and marketing material are left out.
UHNW client ratings
2.6 out of 5, based on 127 client ratings across its booking centres.
United States1.4 out of 543 ratings
Switzerland3.0 out of 52 ratings
Luxembourg3.9 out of 516 ratings
Hong Kong1.8 out of 531 ratings
Singapore4.6 out of 524 ratings
Jersey2.7 out of 511 ratings
What clients report
United States. The CFPB complaints database holds 179,623 complaints against JPMorgan Chase & Co. up to 6 November 2026, a count that covers all customers of the national bank, mostly retail, and does not isolate the private bank. The two Epstein-related suits that the bank settled in 2023, for USD 75 million with the US Virgin Islands and USD 290 million with a class of survivors, were not brought by clients, and the bank admitted no liability in either. Neither settlement was final when reported, as both required the approval of the court.
Switzerland. Independent press reporting on the bank covers its growth plans and the 1MDB penalty order, and none of it describes a data breach, a client-money incident or the loss of a team. The SEC settlements of October 2024 over conflicts in wealth products concern US sister companies, not clients of the Swiss bank.
Luxembourg. The CSSF runs an out-of-court complaint procedure for Luxembourg banks but publishes no decisions naming firms, so no complaints figures exist for J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg Branch. The bank has no Luxembourg Trustpilot profile, and no claim by a private client against it has reached a published judgment. The decisions against the branch and its legal entity since 2024 concern sanctions screening, suspicious transaction reporting and capital reporting, not the treatment of clients.
Hong Kong. The Hong Kong record that touches clients is regulatory: the HKMA penalty of December 2018 for customer due diligence failures between April 2012 and February 2014, in which the HKMA noted that the bank had identified some of the deficiencies itself and ordered an independent review. None of the US penalties since 2020 on the head office, the parent or the US broker-dealer is tied to clients in Hong Kong.
Singapore. In December 2024, MAS imposed a civil penalty of SGD 2.4 million over inaccurate or incomplete disclosures in 24 bond trades. The bank admitted liability. MAS reported that affected clients received refunds for the excess charges and that the bank strengthened its pricing framework and internal controls.
Jersey. Complaints about the Jersey branch can be taken to the Channel Islands Financial Ombudsman. The CFPB complaints database covers all customers of the national bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., mostly US retail clients, and does not single out the Jersey branch.
Worth raising with the bank
United States. Ask how the bank's onboarding and review of high-risk private clients changed after the Epstein settlements of 2023, and who now signs off such relationships.
Switzerland. Ask what controls on large outgoing transfers changed after the 1MDB failings that led to the FINMA proceedings of June 2017 and the penalty order of August 2025, and who signs such transfers off today.
Switzerland. Ask whether in-house J.P. Morgan funds or programmes are used in the family's mandate, given the SEC settlements of October 2024 with US sister companies over conflicted recommendations.
Luxembourg. Ask whether the remediation of the sanctions screening gaps found by the CSSF in October 2024 covers private-banking accounts as well as the transfer-researcher business, and when it was completed.
Luxembourg. Ask whether accounts booked in Luxembourg were among those behind the late suspicious transaction reports for which BaFin fined J.P. Morgan SE in 2025.
Hong Kong. Ask how the bank discloses its mark-ups on over-the-counter bond trades, after the MAS civil penalty of December 2024 over relationship managers' pricing disclosures in Singapore.
Hong Kong. Ask what the independent review ordered by the HKMA in December 2018 found, and whether the customer due diligence changes it led to cover all Hong Kong private bank relationships.
Singapore. Ask how the branch now checks that bond-trade spreads match the terms agreed with clients, and how it handles any discrepancies.
Jersey. Ask whether the conflict-of-interest controls the OCC found lacking in the fiduciary business in November 2020 now cover discretionary mandates booked in Jersey, and what was changed.
Jersey. Ask whether J.P. Morgan in-house funds are used in the family's portfolios, given the SEC settlements of October 2024 with sister companies over clone mutual funds and undisclosed incentives.
Financial standing
Credit ratings published by the agencies for the companies named in the centre files, dated by the latest agency or bank document that confirms them
The OCC terminated its March 2024 trade surveillance order against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which had carried a USD 250 million penalty alongside USD 98.2 million paid to the Federal Reserve.
The OCC terminated, by an order dated 30 March 2026, its consent order of March 2024 over trade surveillance gaps at the JPMorgan group, without giving a reason.
The ECB imposed EUR 12.18 million in penalties on J.P. Morgan SE for misreporting credit risk and CVA risk-weighted assets over periods between 2019 and 2024.
BaFin fined JPMorgan's Frankfurt-based subsidiary EUR 45 million, its largest fine on a financial institution, for suspicious transaction reports not filed on time between October 2021 and September 2022.
The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland fined J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA CHF 3 million over PetroSaudi-related transfers of about CHF 174 million in 2014 and 2015, and the order became binding as neither side contested it.
J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg SA, since merged into J.P. Morgan SE, planned to cut 105 of 475 Luxembourg jobs by moving fund accounting to Edinburgh and transfer agency to India.
What it costs
What J.P. Morgan charges, centre by centre
Fees are set by each booking entity, so they are shown centre by centre. Three of the six centres of J.P. Morgan publish a fee schedule, read on 6 November 2026 from the documents linked under each table. To compare banks fairly we put every published fee in US dollars at the same indicative rates and apply it to the same reference amounts, then rate each fee against the average of the other banks that publish it. Five stars is the lowest fee, one star the highest. Terms a family actually negotiates are often different, and a bank can change its schedule at any time.
The published fees side by side
Fee
United States
Hong Kong
Singapore
Other banks
Equity tradecommission on a USD 250,000 trade, major exchange
0.50%
Not in the schedule
Not in the schedule
0.81%average of 47 other banks
Third party fund subscriptionfee on a USD 250,000 subscription
0.0 basis points
Not in the schedule
Not in the schedule
1.41%average of 42 other banks
Currency conversionmargin on a USD 1 million spot conversion
1.50%
0.05%
0.05%
0.69%average of 30 other banks
Lombard loan marginmargin over the reference rate
reference rate + 1.85%
Not in the schedule
Not in the schedule
Not compared
Minimum annual feeper year, or fee below the asset threshold
Not in the schedule
USD 5,000 a year
USD 5,000 a year
USD 4,320 a yearaverage of 38 other banks
Outgoing international transferper transfer, standard
Not in the schedule
USD 20
USD 20
USD 58average of 61 other banks
Each fee is rated against the average of the other banks that publish it: five stars is the lowest, one star the highest. The schedules, their dates and what each leaves out are listed centre by centre below.
United States · JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationCentre file
Not in the published schedule: custody and safekeeping, discretionary mandate, advisory mandate, bond trade, account maintenance, minimum annual fee, outgoing international transfer, transfer of securities to another bank, closing the account.
Third party payments. The schedule states: “JPMS may receive payments from mutual fund sponsors, currently 0.00% to 0.10% annually on J.P. Morgan Funds held on the full service platform.”
No fee schedule is published for this booking centre.
Luxembourg · J.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg BranchCentre file
Pricing not published
No fee schedule is published for this booking centre.
Hong Kong · JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Hong Kong BranchCentre file
Not in the published schedule: custody and safekeeping, discretionary mandate, advisory mandate, equity trade, bond trade, third party fund subscription, account maintenance, transfer of securities to another bank, closing the account, lombard loan margin.
Singapore · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore BranchCentre file
Not in the published schedule: custody and safekeeping, discretionary mandate, advisory mandate, equity trade, bond trade, third party fund subscription, account maintenance, transfer of securities to another bank, closing the account, lombard loan margin.
Jersey · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jersey BranchCentre file
Pricing not published
No fee schedule is published for this booking centre.
How the comparison works: USD 25 million booked with the bank: half under a discretionary balanced mandate, half in custody with advice; 24 equity trades of USD 250,000 and 8 bond trades of USD 500,000 a year; 6 currency conversions of USD 1 million; 24 outgoing international transfers. Tiered fees are applied to those amounts tranche by tranche, stated minimums are applied, and amounts are converted at indicative rates of 2026-11-06. Read how we compare fees.
The bank at a glance
Identity, protection and services
Ownership
Group parentJPMorgan Chase & Co. (listed, NYSE) Source
ControlWidely held; no shareholder with 10% or more Source (31 March 2026)
Disclosed holdings of 3% or moreVanguard Capital Management 7.06% Source (31 March 2026)
Ownership is shown as published, with its date. It describes who owns the bank; it does not, by itself, suggest any wrongdoing by the bank or its owners.
SwitzerlandJ.P. Morgan (Suisse) SAFINMA · Locally incorporated subsidiary · LEI VNJ8GUF91FD6KSMJCG78Licence: Bank Source
LuxembourgJ.P. Morgan SE, Luxembourg BranchBaFin/ECB (home, licence holder J.P. Morgan SE, Frankfurt; ECB significant institution); CSSF (host) · Branch of J.P. Morgan SE, Frankfurt am Main (LEI 549300ZK53CNGEEI6A29)Licence: Luxembourg branch of J.P. Morgan SE (German SE, credit institution) Source
Hong KongJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Hong Kong BranchHKMA (licensed bank incorporated outside Hong Kong); SFC (registered institution); home supervisor OCC · Branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association · LEI 7H6GLXDRUGQFU57RNE97Licence: Licensed bank, incorporated outside Hong Kong (branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association) Source
SingaporeJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore BranchMAS · Branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Licence: Full Bank; also Exempt Capital Markets Services Entity, Exempt Financial Adviser, Exempt Trust Company Source
JerseyJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jersey BranchJersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC); licence holder JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. supervised by the US OCC · Branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. · LEI 7H6GLXDRUGQFU57RNE97Licence: JFSC-regulated Jersey branch (deposit-taking under the Banking Business (Jersey) Law 1991 inferred from deposit scheme membership; register reference not obtained) Source
Offered at one or more booking centresOffered by the group, not confirmed at a centreNot located, which does not mean unavailable Checked on the bank's own pages for each centre.
Access and costs
Minimum relationshipUnited States:Not published Switzerland:Not published Luxembourg:Not published Hong Kong:Not published Singapore:Not published Jersey:Not published
US personsUnited States: Not published Switzerland: Not published Luxembourg: Not published Hong Kong: Not published Singapore: Not published Jersey: Not published
Fee scheduleUnited States: Published SourceCompared below Switzerland:Not published Luxembourg:Not published Hong Kong: Published, 5 June 2024 (as listed on the Useful Information page); the sheet itself carries only a 2025 copyright SourceCompared below Singapore: Published, 5 June 2024 (as listed on the Useful Information page); the sheet itself carries only a 2025 copyright SourceCompared below Jersey:Not published
Third party paymentsUnited States: Published Source Switzerland: Published Source Luxembourg: Not published Hong Kong: Not published Singapore: Not published Jersey: Not published
Transfer out termsUnited States: Not published Switzerland: Published Source Luxembourg: Not published Hong Kong: Not published Singapore: Not published Jersey: Not published
Protection of client assets
Deposit protectionUnited States: National banks are FDIC insured: USD 250,000 per depositor, per bank, for each ownership category. Securities are not deposits. Switzerland: All banks with a Swiss office must be members of esisuisse: privileged deposits are protected up to CHF 100,000 per client per bank, including non-resident clients and foreign currency deposits, within a system cap. Luxembourg: A Luxembourg branch of a bank from another EU state is covered by its home state scheme, not the FGDL; the home scheme limit is also EUR 100,000. Hong Kong: Bank states its deposit protection coverage: Any deposit and time deposit having a term not exceeding 5 years maintained with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Hong Kong branch constitute eligible deposits under the Deposit Protection Scheme Ordinance (Cap. 581) of Hong Kong qualified for protection by the Deposit Protection Scheme in Hong Kong up to a maximum limit of HK$800,000 per depositor. Singapore: Full banks in Singapore, including local banks and qualifying full banks, are members of the SDIC Deposit Insurance Scheme unless exempted by MAS: S$100,000 per depositor per member. Membership taken from the SDIC rule; the named member list is to be checked. Only eligible Singapore-dollar deposits are insured; deposits in US dollars or other currencies are not covered. Jersey: Jersey Depositors Compensation Scheme: GBP 50,000 per eligible depositor per Jersey banking group, payment aimed within seven working days; the GBP 100 million total cap was removed on 1 April 2026.
Custody lawUnited States: 12 CFR 9.13(b) requires a national bank to keep fiduciary account assets separate from the bank's own assets; securities at a broker-dealer are customer property under SIPA with SIPC protection. Re-use and lending are governed by account agreements and regulator rules rather than a single statute. Switzerland: Swiss Banking Act art. 37d: custody assets held for clients are separated from the bankrupt bank's estate and handed over to the clients, with privileged deposits protected under arts. 37a and 37h. Luxembourg: Law of 1 August 2001 on the circulation of securities: securities held on account are an intangible interest of the account holders and are claimed collectively from the liquidator, with any shortfall shared pro rata (Arts 3(1), 10(1), 10(2)). Rules on re-use were not located in the statute text read. Hong Kong: Client securities held by licensed or registered persons must be safeguarded under the Securities and Futures Ordinance and the Securities and Futures (Client Securities) Rules, as referenced in SFC Code of Conduct para 11.1. Singapore: Not published Jersey: Investment Business (Client Assets) (Jersey) Order 2001: client property must be segregated and held on trust, and art. 22 allows a firm to lend client property only with the client's written consent. It applies to banks registered for investment business.
Custody termsUnited States, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Singapore and Jersey: Not published Switzerland: Published Source
Before opening an account
If uninvested cash is swept, where would it go and what deposit insurance could apply? United States
What notice, charges and settlement steps apply if we transfer the portfolio to another custodian? United States
Moving the portfolio. Use the published transfer terms as a starting point. Ask the bank to flag positions in your portfolio that would require consent, manual handling or a sale, and to quote the charges separately. Switzerland
Trust accounts. The group describes fiduciary services. Ask whether the entity named in this profile can open the proposed trust account and which company would act as trustee, custodian and adviser. Switzerland, Luxembourg and Hong Kong
Written pricing. Ask for a quote that covers the account you would actually open, including fees charged by third parties and the cost of moving assets out. Switzerland
Custody agreement. The applicable legal framework is set out above. Ask for the agreement that would govern your account and check how securities are titled, whether any sub-custodian is used, and when the bank may take a lien. Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Jersey
Transferring assets out. Ask which positions can be transferred without selling them, who approves exceptions, and how charges are calculated for each position and market. Luxembourg and Jersey
Currency conversion. The fee comparison shows 0.05% for the reference FX transaction. Ask for the spread on your usual currency pairs and trade sizes, with the benchmark rate named in the quote. See published fees. Hong Kong
Can we see a sample bond trade confirmation showing the agreed spread and execution price? Singapore
Which agreement governs securities booked in Singapore, and where would those assets be held? Singapore
Cross-border eligibility. If a settlor, beneficiary or beneficial owner has U.S. ties, ask the named entity to confirm eligibility for your structure and which investment services it can provide. Jersey
Your experience
Rate J.P. Morgan
If you bank with J.P. Morgan in any of its booking centres, or advise clients who do, your experience forms part of its PPLI.com rating. Please say which centre you deal with. Every response is read by the editor and treated in strict confidence.
Before we publish a significant negative finding that is not already public, we give the bank the facts and time to comment, on the same timetable for every bank. Decisions of regulators and courts are shown as they were published. Corrections we verify are published with the date of the change. Write to [email protected] quoting the reference of the booking centre concerned: United States BK-US-JPMORGAN-0FC7A7; Switzerland BK-CH-JPMORGAN-SUISSE-403632; Luxembourg BK-LU-JPMORGAN-SE-D2B665; Hong Kong BK-HK-JPMORGAN-HK-ADFF58; Singapore BK-SG-JPMORGAN-SG-7A93D8; Jersey BK-JE-JPMORGAN-JERSEY-9399DE.
Reviewing this file with us
Families and their advisers read this file before they open an account. It can only be as complete as the documents we can find, and much of what sets a private bank apart, from its custody terms to the way a client team works, is rarely published.
If you represent J.P. Morgan, one of our Bank Intelligence analysts can go through the file with you: correct anything that is out of date, add terms and documents that are not yet public, and set out what has improved since our last edition. The review is a paid engagement for the analyst's time and research.
The rating itself stays with our editor and follows what the documents show, so we cannot promise a particular result. When a review changes the file, this page notes that the bank took part, with the date and what was added.
Brought together by the PPLI.com research desk from the files of its booking centres and the public sources listed. The rating is our editorial opinion; read how the overall rating is built.
Important information. Editorial opinion of PPLI.com on the date shown, based on public information, client experience and editorial judgment. Not a statement of fact, a credit rating or investment, legal, tax or financial advice; verify with the bank and your own advisers before acting. No liability is accepted for reliance on this content. Bank names and logos are used for identification only. Ratings are updated every quarter. This is the Q4 2026 edition, and a rating can change between editions if something material happens. Full disclaimer
Rating signed by Noam Cohen, Editor, Bank IntelligenceReviewed 6 November 2026Methodology 2.4Overall rating weighted by UHNW client ratings
Read our Privacy Policy before submitting. Share only the information needed to describe your question; do not include medical records or account credentials.